Comments on: The Problem With Chrome http://www.userdrivenchange.com/the-problem-with-chrome Give Them What They Want Sun, 22 Aug 2010 07:15:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Micheal Benjamin http://www.userdrivenchange.com/the-problem-with-chrome/comment-page-1#comment-561 Micheal Benjamin Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:15:57 +0000 http://www.100dollarseo.com/?p=233#comment-561 Pretty nice blog. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to point out that I've enjoyed browsing your weblog articles. I'll be opting-in for your rss and I hope you write again soon! Pretty nice blog. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to point out that I’ve enjoyed browsing your weblog articles. I’ll be opting-in for your rss and I hope you write again soon!

]]> By: Josh Dirks http://www.userdrivenchange.com/the-problem-with-chrome/comment-page-1#comment-180 Josh Dirks Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:56:20 +0000 http://www.100dollarseo.com/?p=233#comment-180 I have been using both Firefox 3 and Chrome for the past two weeks. I find that Chrome is way faster the Firefox unless you are looking at a site not in the top million. I love the independent tabs. I did however find it interesting that Google extended it's relationship with Firefox despite the Chrome launch. It is my understanding that their new partnership will run through 2011 (http://www.ginside.com/2008/1898/google-mozilla-firefox-2011/). Carlos I would love your insight into this partnership because some of your fears about Chrome I suspect are already happening with Firefox thus making Google interested in extending the relationship with Mozilla. Just a hunch but you said it best "Google is not a benevolent organization". I have been using both Firefox 3 and Chrome for the past two weeks. I find that Chrome is way faster the Firefox unless you are looking at a site not in the top million. I love the independent tabs. I did however find it interesting that Google extended it’s relationship with Firefox despite the Chrome launch. It is my understanding that their new partnership will run through 2011 (http://www.ginside.com/2008/1898/google-mozilla-firefox-2011/). Carlos I would love your insight into this partnership because some of your fears about Chrome I suspect are already happening with Firefox thus making Google interested in extending the relationship with Mozilla. Just a hunch but you said it best “Google is not a benevolent organization”.

]]> By: Carlos del Rio http://www.userdrivenchange.com/the-problem-with-chrome/comment-page-1#comment-182 Carlos del Rio Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:12:48 +0000 http://www.100dollarseo.com/?p=233#comment-182 Interesting that it does run faster. Good for it. I still won't be playing with it till the Mac version comes out. I might have to take an afternoon to play with it on my other machine. Interesting that it does run faster. Good for it.

I still won’t be playing with it till the Mac version comes out. I might have to take an afternoon to play with it on my other machine.

]]> By: Michael Martinez http://www.userdrivenchange.com/the-problem-with-chrome/comment-page-1#comment-181 Michael Martinez Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:40:53 +0000 http://www.100dollarseo.com/?p=233#comment-181 I've been using it on a daily basis since it came out. In fact, I'm trying to use it in place of other browsers. Except for the fact that certain Web sites don't display and that I cannot use my thread tools on SF-Fandom, I haven't had too many complaints about it. It's much better than FireSucks and Internet Destroyer, but there have been times when I've referred to it as Crumb. I wish it were as stable as they had made it out to be. I've crashed the entire browser several times already -- so much for "separate processes and separate threads per tab". It scrolls better and responds to my keystrokes better than Firesucks. It's also WAY faster than Internet Destroyer. In fact, it's way faster than FireSucks, too. I'm not ready to make it my default browser but in a few more upgrades I'll probably take that step (note: I have yet to test Destroyer 8 or FireSucks 3). I’ve been using it on a daily basis since it came out. In fact, I’m trying to use it in place of other browsers.

Except for the fact that certain Web sites don’t display and that I cannot use my thread tools on SF-Fandom, I haven’t had too many complaints about it.

It’s much better than FireSucks and Internet Destroyer, but there have been times when I’ve referred to it as Crumb.

I wish it were as stable as they had made it out to be. I’ve crashed the entire browser several times already — so much for “separate processes and separate threads per tab”.

It scrolls better and responds to my keystrokes better than Firesucks. It’s also WAY faster than Internet Destroyer. In fact, it’s way faster than FireSucks, too.

I’m not ready to make it my default browser but in a few more upgrades I’ll probably take that step (note: I have yet to test Destroyer 8 or FireSucks 3).

]]>