<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search Standards Protect Site Owners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.userdrivenchange.com/search-standards-protect-site-owners/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.userdrivenchange.com/search-standards-protect-site-owners?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=search-standards-protect-site-owners</link>
	<description>Give Them What They Want</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:15:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stupid Comment Spamming</title>
		<link>http://www.userdrivenchange.com/search-standards-protect-site-owners/comment-page-1#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Stupid Comment Spamming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.100dollarseo.com/?p=134#comment-114</guid>
		<description>[...] I went in to moderate the comments on &#8220;SEO Standards Protect Site Owners&#8221; and I found the most amazingly stupid piece of comment spam. Someone had actually copied [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I went in to moderate the comments on &#8220;SEO Standards Protect Site Owners&#8221; and I found the most amazingly stupid piece of comment spam. Someone had actually copied [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos del Rio</title>
		<link>http://www.userdrivenchange.com/search-standards-protect-site-owners/comment-page-1#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos del Rio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.100dollarseo.com/?p=134#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Well, I am not a fan of bureaucracy. Keep it simple and it will be easy for people to take part in.

I for one will not support anything that is trying to enforce arbitrary minutiae.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I am not a fan of bureaucracy. Keep it simple and it will be easy for people to take part in.</p>
<p>I for one will not support anything that is trying to enforce arbitrary minutiae.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SlightlyShadySEO</title>
		<link>http://www.userdrivenchange.com/search-standards-protect-site-owners/comment-page-1#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>SlightlyShadySEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.100dollarseo.com/?p=134#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Well first, thanks for the link ;)
Second, I really wish that people could keep the rules you mentioned here. But I think it&#039;s obvious that no beaurocracy(as it would be) would ever stop at those points. I have a feeling it would become an endless squabble about pointless crap like can you submit your own content to digg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well first, thanks for the link ;)<br />
Second, I really wish that people could keep the rules you mentioned here. But I think it&#8217;s obvious that no beaurocracy(as it would be) would ever stop at those points. I have a feeling it would become an endless squabble about pointless crap like can you submit your own content to digg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
