<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brand Fluidity and Brand Loyalty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.userdrivenchange.com/brand-fluidity-and-brand-loyalty/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.userdrivenchange.com/brand-fluidity-and-brand-loyalty?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=brand-fluidity-and-brand-loyalty</link>
	<description>Give Them What They Want</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:15:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Urie</title>
		<link>http://www.userdrivenchange.com/brand-fluidity-and-brand-loyalty/comment-page-1#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Urie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.userdrivenchange.com/?p=562#comment-302</guid>
		<description>Yeah,going back and forth is hard on Twitter,I agree. It goes back to my 60-30-10 idea. It&#039;s all about adding value to the community, and conversations are one way to add value.

But you can add value in a lot of ways.

BTW, when I choose who to follow the @ is just part of how I make that decision. I love when people RT people or link to others blogs as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah,going back and forth is hard on Twitter,I agree. It goes back to my 60-30-10 idea. It&#8217;s all about adding value to the community, and conversations are one way to add value.</p>
<p>But you can add value in a lot of ways.</p>
<p>BTW, when I choose who to follow the @ is just part of how I make that decision. I love when people RT people or link to others blogs as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos del Rio</title>
		<link>http://www.userdrivenchange.com/brand-fluidity-and-brand-loyalty/comment-page-1#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos del Rio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.userdrivenchange.com/?p=562#comment-301</guid>
		<description>I agree that conversation is valid goal in social media, but I don&#039;t think that Twitter really hits that mark. It is so disjointed and limited in structurally to be anything other than a launching pad.

Answering a customer query in a Tweet seems more about showing the world that you respond rather than actually about addressing the issue--like when companies spend millions of dollars advertising that they are giving a hundred thousand dollars to a charity.

I think that Twitter was better before it was flooded companies. Micro-blogging seems too restrictive a field for real conversation even if its value for sentiment monitoring and information transfer is high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that conversation is valid goal in social media, but I don&#8217;t think that Twitter really hits that mark. It is so disjointed and limited in structurally to be anything other than a launching pad.</p>
<p>Answering a customer query in a Tweet seems more about showing the world that you respond rather than actually about addressing the issue&#8211;like when companies spend millions of dollars advertising that they are giving a hundred thousand dollars to a charity.</p>
<p>I think that Twitter was better before it was flooded companies. Micro-blogging seems too restrictive a field for real conversation even if its value for sentiment monitoring and information transfer is high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Urie</title>
		<link>http://www.userdrivenchange.com/brand-fluidity-and-brand-loyalty/comment-page-1#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Urie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.userdrivenchange.com/?p=562#comment-300</guid>
		<description>Carlos,

Thanks for the out of the &quot;echo chamber&quot; response. It&#039;s great to have conversations with people like you, who have a different take on social media than myself.

As with any social network, they are what you make of it. If you want it to be a broadcast medium, but all means broadcast.
 
As for businesses that want to broadcast with social media however, they are never going to achieve the &quot;following&quot; or connection with their audience that social media can provide them. 

We can already get these messages from their website and advertising. To develop loyal customers you must let them connect with your brand, the people behind the brand, and you must show them they are valued.
  
In other words the best thing brands can do is to treat their customers as friends, and I don&#039;t want a friend that doesn&#039;t listen or interact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carlos,</p>
<p>Thanks for the out of the &#8220;echo chamber&#8221; response. It&#8217;s great to have conversations with people like you, who have a different take on social media than myself.</p>
<p>As with any social network, they are what you make of it. If you want it to be a broadcast medium, but all means broadcast.</p>
<p>As for businesses that want to broadcast with social media however, they are never going to achieve the &#8220;following&#8221; or connection with their audience that social media can provide them. </p>
<p>We can already get these messages from their website and advertising. To develop loyal customers you must let them connect with your brand, the people behind the brand, and you must show them they are valued.</p>
<p>In other words the best thing brands can do is to treat their customers as friends, and I don&#8217;t want a friend that doesn&#8217;t listen or interact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
